• Mike Johnson endorsed a book with homophobic content and conspiracy theories.
• Scott McKay’s book targets Pete Buttigieg with derogatory language.
• Johnson actively promoted the book, sparking leadership concerns.
• Johnson’s response to criticism was minimal.
• The endorsement amplifies concerns about Johnson’s conservative views.

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson’s endorsement of “The Revivalist Manifesto,” a book laden with conspiracy theories and homophobic rhetoric, has ignited significant controversy. Authored by Louisiana-based blogger Scott McKay, the book has been sharply criticized for propagating unfounded conspiracy theories, including the discredited “Pizzagate” hoax which falsely alleged a pedophile ring involving senior Democratic officials. McKay’s book also makes unsubstantiated claims about Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts’ involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and disparages various groups, including poor voters and Democratic officials.

One of the most contentious aspects of the book is its derogatory treatment of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. Buttigieg is subject to homophobic slurs, being described as “queer,” “openly, and obnoxiously, gay,” and labeled as “Gay Mayor Pete Buttigieg.” The book’s approach to Buttigieg’s sexuality has been widely condemned for its blatant homophobia.

Johnson’s involvement with the book extends beyond writing its foreword. He actively promoted it on his social media channels and dedicated an episode of his podcast to interviewing McKay. This endorsement, particularly given Johnson’s ascent to the speakership, has intensified scrutiny of his socially conservative views. Johnson, in the past, has described homosexuality as “inherently unnatural” and “dangerous,” even attributing it, in part, to the downfall of the Roman Empire.

Despite the outcry, Johnson and McKay have remained largely silent on the controversy. A spokesperson for Johnson claimed that he did not read the highlighted passages in the book and disagreed with them. However, Johnson’s endorsement of the book, as he mentioned in the foreword, was to support the general theme of the book, not necessarily an endorsement of all opinions expressed.

Critics argue that Johnson’s promotion of such a book raises serious questions about his judgment. Experts on right-wing conspiracy theories have expressed concerns about Johnson’s leadership potentially opening doors for fringe beliefs to wield disproportionate political power. The book’s content and Johnson’s endorsement have been described as “the lurid daydreams of certain online far-right sentiments,” highlighting the concern over the influence of such extremist views in politics​​​​​​​​​​​​​​. (Advocate, BNN, The Daily Beast)